Reply to critics

Anton N. For­tu­na­tov
Lobachevsky State Uni­ver­si­ty of Nizh­ni Nov­gorod

Reply to crit­ics

DOI:10.5840/dspl20181445

Ref­er­ences:

  1. Kant, I. Kri­ti­ka chis­to­go razu­ma [Cri­tique of Pure Rea­son]. Ros­tov-na-Donu: Feniks Publ., 1999. 599 pp. (In Russ­ian)
  2. Pat­zlaff, R, Zastyvshij vzglyad. Fizio­logich­eskoe vozde­jstvie telev­i­deniya na razvi­tie detej [Frozen Look: Phys­i­o­log­i­cal Effects of Tele­vi­sion on Chil­dren Devel­op­ment / Der gefrorene Blick: Phys­i­ol­o­gis­cheWirkun­gen des Fernse­hens und die Entwick­lung des Kindes]. Moscow: Evi­den­tis Publ., 2011. 224 pp. (In Russ­ian)

Comments are closed.