The Digital Scholar Revisited
Abstract. The book The Digital Scholar was published in 2011, and used Boyer’s framework of scholarship to examine the possible impact of digital, networked technology on scholarly practice. In 2011 the general attitude towards digital scholarship was cautious, although areas of innovative practice were emerging. Using this book as a basis, the author considers changes in digital scholar-ship since its publication. Five key themes are identified: mainstreaming of digital scholarship, so that it is a widely accepted and encouraged practice; the shift to open, with the emphasis on the benefits that open practice brings rather than the digital or networked aspects; policy implementation, particularly in areas of educational technology platforms, open access policies and open educational resources; network identity, emphasising the development of academic identity through social media and other tools; criticality of digital scholarship, which examines the negative issues associated with online abuse, privacy and data usage. Each of these themes is explored, and their impact in terms of Boyer’s original framing of scholarly activity considered. Boy-er’s four scholarly activities of discovery, integration, application and teaching can be viewed from the perspective of these five themes. In conclusion what has been realised does not constitute a revolution in academic practice, but rather a gradual acceptance and utilisation of digital scholarship techniques, practices and values. It is simultaneously true that both radical change has taken place, and nothing has fundamentally altered. Much of the increased adoption in academia mirrors the wider penetration of social media tools amongst society in general, so academics are more likely to have an identity in such places that mixes professional and personal.
Keywords: digital scholarship, e-learning, higher education, open education, social media.
- “About Academia”, Academia.edu. 2017. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/about (accessed on: January 15, 2018).
Anderson, C. The long tail: How endless choice is creating unlimited de-mand. London: Random, 2007. 288 p.
- Barber, M., Donnelly, K., Rizv, S. “An avalanche is coming: Higher educa-tion and the revolution ahead”. The Institute of Public Policy Research. 2013. Available at: http://www.ippr.org/images/media/files/publication/2013/03/avalanche-is-coming_Mar2013_10432.pdf (accessed on: January 17, 2018).
- Benyayer, D. Open Models: Business Models of the Open Economy. Without Model. 2016. Available at: https://unglueit-files.s3.amazonaws.com/ebf/1254a7fd3c9c4e7e855f4e6884ad91cd.pdf (accessed on: January 14, 2018).
- Boyer, E.L. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Law-renceville, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990. 148 p.
- Castells, M. The rise of the network society. (The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume 1). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Inc., 1996. 556 p.
- Chesbrough, H.W. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, 2006. 227 p.
- Christensen, C.M. The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1997. 252 p.
- Christensen, C.M., Horn, M.B., Johnson, C.W. Disrupting class: how dis-ruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008. 288 p.
- Costa, C. The participatory web in the context of academic research: Land-scapes of change and conflicts: Doctoral dissertation. University of Salford, 2013. 309 p.
- Costa, C. “Outcasts on the inside: academics reinventing themselves online”, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 2015, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 194–210. DOI: 10.1080/02601370.2014.985752
- Costa C. “Double gamers: academics between fields”, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2016, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 993‑1013. DOI: 10.1080/01425692.2014.982861
- Dennen V.P. “Constructing academic alter-egos: identity issues in a blog-based community”, Identity in the Information Society, 2009, vol. 2, no.1, pp. 23–38. DOI: 10.1007/s12394-009‑0020-8
- Donelan H. “Social media for professional development and networking opportunities in academia”, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2016, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 706–729. DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014321
- Economist “The new political divide”, The Economist. Jul 30th 2016. Available at: https://www.economist.com/leaders/2016/07/30/the-new-political-divide (accessed on: January 8, 2018).
- Edinburgh MOOC Research Group. MOOCs @ Edinburgh 2013: Report No.1. Available at: https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/6683 (accessed on: January 8, 2018).
- Esposito A. “Neither digital or open. Just researchers: Views on digital/open scholarship practices in an Italian university”, First Monday, 2013, vol. 18, no. 1. Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3881/3404 (accessed on: January 8, 2018). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v18i1.3881
- Evans P., Wurster T.S. Blown to bits: How the new economics of information transforms strategy. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 288 p.
- Ewins R. “Who are You? Weblogs and Academic Identity”, E–Learning and Digital Media, 2005, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 368–377. DOI: 10.2304/elea.2005.2.4.368
- Gourlay L. “Open education as a ‘heterotopia of desire’”, Learning, Media and Technology, 2015, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 310–327. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2015.1029941
- Gruzd A., Staves K., Wilk A. “Tenure and promotion in the age of online social media”, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801154
- Hall R. MOOCs and Neo-liberalism: for a critical response. Jul 11, 2013.Available at: http://www.richard-hall.org/2013/07/11/moocs-and-neoliberalism-for-a-critical-response/ (accessed on: January 8, 2018).
- Hilton III J., Robinson T., Wiley D., Ackerman J. “Cost-savings Achieved in Two Semesters Through the Adoption of Open Educational Resources”, The International Review of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 2014, vol. 15, no. 2. Available at: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1700/2833 (accessed on: January 14, 2018). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1700
- Jordan K. “Examining the UK Higher Education sector through the network of institutional accounts on Twitter”, First Monday, 2017, vol. 22no. 5. Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/7133/6145 (accessed on: January 14, 2018). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v22i5.7133
- Jordan K. Understanding the structure and role of academics’ ego-networks on social networking sites. PhD thesis The Open University. 2017. Available at: http://oro.open.ac.uk/48259/ (accessed on: January 14, 2018).
- Keskin N.Ö., Koutropoulos A., De Waard I., Metcalf D., Gallagher M., Anzai Y., Buyuk K. “National Strategies for OER and MOOCs From 2010 to 2020: Canada, Japan, South Korea, Turkey, UK, and USA”, Administrative Leadership in Open and Distance Learning Programs, 2017, pp. 188–212.Available at: https://kyushu-u.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/national-strategies-for-oer-and-moocs-from-2010-to-2020-canada-ja (accessed on: January 14, 2018).
- Lupton D. “Feeling Better Connected: Academics’ Use of Social Media”, Canberra: News & Media Research Centre. University of Canberra, 2014.Available at: https://www.canberra.edu.au/about-uc/faculties/arts-design/attachments2/pdf/n-and-mrc/Feeling-Better-Connected-report-final.pdf (accessed on: January 8, 2018).
- Lupton D., Mewburn I., Thomson P. “The Digital Academic: Identities, Contexts and Politics”, in: Lupton, D., Mewburn, I., & Thomson, P. (Eds.). The Digital Academic: Critical Perspectives on Digital Technologies in Higher Education. L.: Routledge, 2017, pp. 1–19.
- Mapstone S., Buitendijk S., Wiberg E. “Online learning at research-intensive universities”, LERU. Advice paper, 2014, no. 16. Available at: http://www.leru.org/files/publications/LERU_AP16__Online_Learning_at_RIUs_final.pdf (accessed on: January 8, 2018).
- McCarthy M.T. “The big data divide and its consequences”, Sociology Compass, 2016, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1131–1140.
- Medved J.P. “LMS Industry User Research Report”, Capterra, Apr. 8, 2015. Available at: https://www.capterra.com/learning-management-system-software/user-research (accessed on: January 14, 2018).
- Mewburn I., Thomson P. “Why do academics blog? An analysis of audienc-es, purposes and challenges”, Studies in Higher Education, 2013, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1105–1119. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2013.835624
- Procter R., Williams R., Stewart J. “If you build it, will they come? How re-searchers perceive and use web 2.0’”, A Research Information Network, 2010. Available at: http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/web_2.0_screen.pdf (accessed on: January 14, 2018).
- Qayyum A., Zawacki-Richter O. “Major developments, challenges, opportunities in online and distance education — a snapshot based on a global scan”, TeachOnline.ca, 2017. Available at: https://teachonline.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/e-newsletters/major_developments_challenges_opportunities_in_online_and_distance_education.pdf (accessed on: October 7, 2017).
- Redecker C. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu / Punie, Y. (ed). EUR 28775 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017. DOI: 10.2760/159770, JRC107466.
- Selwyn N. “Data entry: towards the critical study of digital data and educa-tion”, Learning, Media and Technology, 2015, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 64–82. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2014.921628
- Slade, S., Prinsloo, P. “Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas”, American Behavioral Scientist, 2013, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1510–1529. DOI: 10.1177/0002764213479366
- SPARC Europe. An Analysis of Open Data and Open Science Policies in Europe. May, 2017 https://sparceurope.org/new-sparc-europe-report-analyses-open-data-open-science-policies-europe/ (accessed on: January 14, 2018).
- Stewart B. “Open to influence: What counts as academic influence in schol-arly networked Twitter participation”, Learning, Media and Technology, 2015, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 287–309. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2015.1015547
- Stewart B.E. “In abundance: Networked participatory practices as scholar-ship”, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2015, vol. 16, no. 3. Available at: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2158/3343 (accessed on: January 8, 2018). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2158.
- Stewart B. “Collapsed publics: Orality, literacy, and vulnerability in academic Twitter”, Journal of Applied Social Theory, 2016, vol. 1, no. 1. Available at: https://socialtheoryapplied.com/journal/jast/article/view/33/9 (accessed on: January 8, 2018).
- Thomson P. “Can I cite a blog post?”, Patthomson.net, 2017. Available at: https://patthomson.net/2017/12/14/can-i-cite-a-blog-post/ (accessed on: January 12, 2018).
- Toetenel L. Rienties B. “Analysing 157 learning designs using learning ana-lytic approaches as a means to evaluate the impact of pedagogical decision-making”, British Journal of Educational Technology, 2016, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 981–992. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12423
- Second World OER Congress Ljubljana OER Action Plan 2017. UNESCO, 2017. Available at: https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/ljubljana_oer_action_plan_2017.pdf (accessed on: January 7, 2018).
- Veletsianos G., Kimmons R. “Networked participatory scholarship: Emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online networks”, Computers & Education, 2012, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 766–774. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.001
- Veletsianos G., Stewart B. “Discreet openness: scholars’ selective and in-tentional self-disclosures online”, Social Media+ Society, 2016, vol. 2, iss. 3. DOI: 10.1177/2056305116664222
- Watters A. “The Weaponization of Education Data”, Hackeducation.com, Dec. 11, 2017. Available at: http://hackeducation.com/2017/12/11/top-ed-tech-trends-weaponized-data (accessed on: January 6, 2018).
- Watters A. “The Myth and the Millennialism of ‘Disruptive Innovation’”, Hackeducation.com. May 24, 2013. Available at: http://hackeducation.com/2013/05/24/disruptive-innovation/ (accessed on: De-cember 17, 2017).
- Weller, M. The Digital Scholar: How Technology Is Transforming Scholarly Practice. L.: Bloomsbury Academic, 2011. Available at: http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/the-digital-scholar-9781849666268/ (accessed on: June 12, 2017). DOI: 10.5040/9781849666275
- Weller M. “MOOCs and the Silicon Valley narrative”, Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2015, iss. 1, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.5334/jime.am
- Weller, M. “The Open Flip – a digital economic model for education”, Journal Of Learning For Development — JL4D, 2016, vol. 3, no. 2. Available at: http://www.jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/152 (accessed on: January 14, 2018).