Svetlana V. Shibarshina
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod
“Small World”, or global campus thirty-six years later
Abstract. This article offers a review and reflection on some trends of today’s academic world through the metaphor of the “global campus” described in the novel The Small World (1984) by David Lodge, an English writer and literary critic. The novel reveals the problems of academic communities in the context of the emerging global neoliberalism. Proceeding from the idea of the university as a “micromodel of society,” which mirrors certain salient trends of social life, I extrapolate this metaphor to the present. The “global campus” appears not only a still trendy metaphor, but also an ever-evolving entity, which is adapting new technologies for its further unfolding. The trends of scientific communications of the 1980s captured in prose are compared with today’s realities, us-ing also the concepts of mobility and networking. In this regard, in the first part of the article I turn to John Urry’s ideas on mobilities and networks, as well as to Peter Galison’s concept of trading zones, aiming to rethink scientific communications in the “physical-virtual” axis. Speaking of academic social networks, in the second part I consider the concepts of distributed knowledge, Sci-ence 2.0 and the like, and suggest a few illustrations of how they are possibly transforming the problem of trust. The third part focuses on academic identity in the digital age and the issue of the “double game.” The latter is understood as an attempt to maneuver between conflicting formats of two worlds. The first, offline academic world, is driven by its long ago recognized mech-anisms for increasing scientific capital, while the second, online world, largely originates in the principles of open science. In conclusion, I emphasize that we may estimate the uncertainty in the further unfolding of the “global campus” as a constructive moment.
Keywords: scientific communication, university, mobilities, global campus, distributed knowledge, trust, academic identity
- Costa, C. “Double gamers: academics between fields,” British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2016, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 993‑1013, doi: 10.1080/01425692.2014.982861
- Dushina, S.A., Khvatova, T.Yu. “Zachem uchenym ResearchGate. Novye vozmozhnosti nauchnykh kommunikatsii” [Why scientists need ResearchGate. New opportunities for scientific communications], in: Revoliutsiia i evoliutsiia: modeli razvitiia v nauke, kulture, sotsiume [Revolution and Evolution: Models of Change in Science, Culture, and Society]: Collected papers. Nizhni Novgorod: Lobachevsky University Press, 2017, pp. 41–43. (In Russian)
- Elliott, A., Urry, J. Mobile Lives: Self, Excess and Nature. London: New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2010.
- Galison, P. “Trading zone. Coordinating action and belief,” in: M. Biagioli (ed.), The Science Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, 1999, pp. 137–160.
- Haustein, S., Toupin, R., Alperin, J.P. “‘Not sure if scientist or just Twitter bot’ Or: Who tweets about scholarly papers,” Almetric Blog, July 12, 2018. Available at: https://www.altmetric.com/blog/not-sure-if-scientist-or-just-twitter-bot-or-who-tweets-about-scholarly-papers/ (accessed on November 21, 2019).
- Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
- Johnson, K.A. “The effect of Twitter posts on students’ perceptions of instructor credibility,” Learning, Media and Technology, 2011, no. 36, pp. 21–38.
- Jones, C., Goodfellow, R. “The ‘Digital University’: discourse, theory, and evidence,” International Journal of Learning and Media, 2012, vol. 4, nos. 3–4, pp. 59–63, doi: 10.1162/IJLM_a_00103.
- Kasavin, I.T. “Illiuziia dareniia: kak seti prevrashchaiut beskorystnyi obmen znaniiami v naviazchivyi kraudsorsing” [The gift illusion: how networks turn selfless knowledge sharing into obsessive crowdsourcing], Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki / Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2019, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 29–36. (In Russian), doi: 10.5840/eps201956464.
- Kupreichenko, A.B. “Doverie i nedoverie – obshchie i spetsificheskie psikhologicheskie kharakteristiki” [Trust and distrust: general and specific psychological characteristics], Vestnik RUDN. Seriia Psikhologiia i pedagogika [Bulletin of the RUDN University. Series Psychology and Pedagogy], 2008, no. 2, pp. 46–53. (In Russian)
- Lekhtsier, V.L. Tsifrovoi stil zhizni i akademicheskie kommunikatsii v auditorii: problema vovlechennosti [Digital lifestyle and academic communication in the university classrooms: the problem of involvement], Vestnik Samarskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. Seriia Filosofiia. Filologiia [Bulletin of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. Philosophy Series. Philology], 2015, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 38–54. (In Russian)
- Lodge, D. Changing Places. A Tale of Two Campuses. London: Penguin Books, 1978.
- Lodge, D. Small World. An Academic Romance. London: Penguin Books, 1985.
- Maslanov, E.V. “Kommunikatsionnye ploshchadki v seti internet kak zony obmena: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniia” [Communication platforms on the Internet as trading zones: advantages and limitations], Filosofiia i kultura [Philosophy and Culture], 2020, no. 2, pp. 1–11. (In Russian), doi: 10.7256/2454–0757.2020.2.32241. Available at: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=32241 (accessed on November 16, 2019).
- Orduna-Malea, E, Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., López-Cózar, E.D. “Do ResearchGate scores create ghost academic reputations?” Scientometrics, 2017, vol. 112, no.1, pp. 443–460, doi: 10.1007/s11192-017‑2396-9.
- Procter, R., Williams, R., Stewart, J. “If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use Web 2.0,” A Research Information Network, July 2010. Available at: http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/web_2.0_screen.pdf (accessed on January 14, 2019).
- Shapin, S. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 2008.
- Shibarshina, S.V. “Sotsialnye seti dlia uchenykh: novaia forma sotsialnosti?” [Social networks for researchers on the Internet: a new sociality?], Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki / Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2019, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 21–28. (In Russian), doi: 10.5840/eps201956463.
- Shipovalova, L.V. “Problema doveriia v tsifrovoi culture” [The problem of trust in digital culture], Studia Culturae, 2019, vol. 3, no. 41, pp. 250–261. (In Russian)
- Shipovalova, L.V. “Raspredelennoe poznanie – analitika i problematizatsiia kontsepta” [Distributed cognition – analytics and problematization of the concept], Tsifrovoi uchenyi: laboratoriia filosofa / The Digital Scholar: Philosopher’s Lab, 2019, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 175–190. (In Russian), doi: 10.5840/dspl20192460
- Sliusarev, V.V., Husyainov, T.M. “‘Tsifrovoi eksgibitsionizm’: samoidentifikatsiia lichnosti v usloviiakh informatsionnogo obshchestva” [‘Digital exhibitionism’: self-identification in the information society], Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Philosophy. Sociology. Law series, 2019, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 434–442. (In Russian), doi: 10.18413/2075–4566-2019–44-3–434-442.
- Slavin, B. “‘Nauka 2.0’ ili ‘Nauka 3.0’” [“‘Science 2.0’ or ‘Science 3.0’”], IT, November 15, 2012. Available at: http://www.it.ru/press_center/blog/2802/ (accessed on November 16, 2019). (In Russian)
- Slavin, B.B. “Noosorsing kak tekhnologiia formirovaniia ‘Nauki 2.0’” [Noosourcing as a technology forming ‘Science 2.0’], Sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii i IT-obrazovanie. Sbornik izbrannykh trudov VI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Contemporary IT and IT-education. Collected Papers from the sixth International Academic Conference]: Tutorial Manual. Moscow: INTUIT.RU Publ., 2011, pp. 60–71. (In Russian)
- Tatalovic, M. “AI writing bots are about to revolutionise science journalism: We must shape how this is done,” Journal of Science Communication, 2018, no. 17 (01), E. Available at: https://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/JCOM_1701_2018_E.pdf (accessed on October 3, 2019).
- Urri, J. Mobilnosti [Mobilities], transl. from English. Moscow: Praksis Publ., 2012. (In Russian)
- Veletsianos, G., Stewart, B. “Discreet openness: scholars’ selective and intentional self-disclosures online,” Social Media+Society, 2016, vol. 2, no. 3, doi: 10.1177/2056305116664222.
- Weller, M. The Digital Scholar: How Technology Is Transforming Scholarly Practice. L.: Bloomsbury Academic, 2011. Available at: http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/the-digital-scholar-9781849666268/ (accessed on June 12, 2017), doi: 10.5040/9781849666275.
- Weller, M. “The Digital Scholar Revisited,” The Digital Scholar: Philosopher’s Lab, 2018, vol. 1, no, 2, pp. 52–71, doi: 10.5840/dspl20181218.
- Zhuravleva, E.Yu. “Nauchno-issledovatelskaia infrastruktura Internet” [Research Infrastructure of Internet], Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy], 2010, no. 6, pp. 155–166. Available at: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=192&Itemid=52 (accessed on November 16, 2019). (In Russian)