Kingston University London
Kingston Business School
Technologising the wave: constructing an energy resource in science and policy
Abstract. Despite the recent shift from renewable energy to a low carbon policy, the UK policy discourse still recognises marine energy as part of the country’s future energy mix. Production of what we call an “assemblage” of technology and ocean waves triggers complex sets of initiatives that provide the basis for the economic viability and credibility of wave energy extraction. However, questions are rarely asked about how the natural phenomenon being part of this assemblage is construed as a resource to become a key element of promises and assessments of potential of renewable energy. This study sheds light on underexplored aspects of the credibility–economy and valuation practices formed around renewable energy that have not yet been problematised in social studies of energy. Arguing that ocean waves become an energy resource largely through resource assessment practices, we examine such practices in the context of the production of scientific and policy discourses around wave energy. Considering waves as an object of expertise, we examine how “wave data” constituted through measurements, statistical analysis, modelling and visualisation, contribute to the assessment and legitimisation of wave energy developments. We also evaluate the prospects for wave energy to be a “good” in future economic exchange.
Keywords: wave as a resource, renewable energy policy, credibility–economy, resource assessment, modelling, “wave data”
- Anderson, J. “Relational places: the surfed wave as assemblage and convergence,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2012, vol. 30, pp. 570–587.
- Babarit, A. Ocean Wave Energy Conversion: Resource, Technologies and Performance. London: ISTE Press; Oxford: Elsevier, 2017.
- Beaulieu, A. “Voxels in the brain: neuroscience, informatics and changing notions of objectivity,” Social Studies of Science, 2001, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 635–680.
- Black, K. 2007. Review of Wave Hub Technical Studies: Impacts on inshore surfing beaches. Exeter: SWRDA, 2007. Available at: http://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Impacts_on_Inshore_Surfing_Beaches.pdf (accessed on January 12, 2017).
- Brooke, J. Wave energy conversion. Elsevier Science, 2003.
- Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., Lente, H.V. “The sociology of expectations in science and technology,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2006, vol. 18, nos. 3/4, pp. 285–298. DOI: 10.1080/09537320600777002
- Brown, N., Michael, M. “A sociology of expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects,” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 2003, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3–18.
- Callon, M., Méadel, C., Rabeharisoa, V. “The economy of qualities,” Economy and Society, 2002, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 194–217. DOI: 10.1080/03085140220123126
- The Renewable Energy Review // Committee on Climate Change. 2011. Available at: https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/the-renewable-energy-review/ (accessed on January 13, 2017).
- Connor, P. “Wave Energy: Going down the Tube?”, The 7th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, 11th – 13th September, 2007. Porto, Portugal.
- Coopmans, C., Vertesi, J., Lynch, M.E., Woolgar, S. (eds.). Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2014.
- Ehrenstein, V, Muniesa, F. “The Conditional Sink: Counterfactual Display in the Valuation of a Carbon Offsetting Reforestation Project,” Valuation Studies, 2013, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 161–188.
- “The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan. National Strategy for Climate and Energy,” Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100509134746/http:/www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/publications/lc_trans_plan/lc_trans_plan.aspx (accessed on January 13, 2017).
- “The UK Renewable Energy Strategy,” Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), July 2009. Available at: http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm76/7686/7686.pdf (accessed on January 13, 2017).
- “Marine Energy Action Plan. Executive Summary and Recommendations,” Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), March 2010. Available at: http://www.marineenergypembrokeshire.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/MarineActionPlan.pdf (accessed on January 13, 2017).
- Drew, B., Plummer, A.R., Sahinkaya, M.N. “A review of wave energy converter technology,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2009, vol. 223, no. 8, pp. 887–902. DOI: 10.1243/09576509JPE782
- “Wave and Tidal-stream Energy Demonstration Scheme,” Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), May 2005. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file23963.pdf (accessed on January 13, 2017).
- Galvin, R. “Modifying Actor-Network Theory to Analyse the German Project of Photovoltaic Electrical Energy Generation,” CSERGE Working Paper, EDM 09–02, 2009. Available at: http://www.rwth-aachen.de/global/show_document.asp?id=aaaaaaaaaahdknd (accessed on January 13, 2017).
- Godin, B. “Models of innovation: Why models of innovation are models, or what work is being done in calling them models?” Social Studies of Science, 2015, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 570–596.
- Granjou, C., Arpin, I. “Epistemic commitments: Making relevant science in biodiversity studies,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, 2015, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1022– 1046.
- Grint, K., Woolgar, S. The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization. New York: Polity Press, 1997.
- Hilgartner, S. Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2000.
- Hilgartner, S. “Making the bioeconomy measurable: politics of an emerging anticipatory machinery (comment),” BioSocieties, 2007, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 382–386.
- Iskandarova, M. Constructing a Macro-Actor in Practice: the Case of Wave Hub. (PhD thesis), University of Exeter, 2013, uk.bl.ethos.586697.
- Iskandarova, M., Simakova, E. “Energy, Expectations, and Expertise: the Case of Wave Hub,” Society for Social Studies of Science (4S) and European Association for the Study of Science and Technology (EASST) Conference 2012: Design and Displacement; 17–20 Oct 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark. (Unpublished)
- Karpik, L. Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.
- Lamont, M. “Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation”, Annual Review of Sociology, 2012, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 201–221.
- Latour, B. “Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern,” Critical Inquiry – Special issue on the Future of Critique, 2003, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 25–248. [Republished in Harper’s Magazine, April 2004, pp.15–20. Republication reprinted in Brown B (ed.) Things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 151–174]
- MacKenzie, D. Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. Cambridge and London: MIT Press, 1990.
- Mennicken, A., Sjogren, E. Editorial Note. “Valuation and Calculation at the margins,” Valuation Studies, 2015, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–7.
- Millar, D., Smith H.C.M., Reeve, D.E. “Modelling analysis of the sensitivity of shoreline change to a wave farm,” Ocean Engineering, 2007, vol. 34, pp. 884–901.
- Nowotny, H. “How many policy room are there?: evidence-based and other kinds of science policies,” Science Technology & Human Values, 2007, vol. 32, no, 4, pp. 479–490.
- Phillips, J., Cruz, J., Holbrow, R., Parkes, J., Rawlinson-Smith, R. “Defining the long-term wave resource at Wave Hub: the role of measurements and models,” Proceedings of the ASME 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering OMAE, Estoril, Portugal, June, 2009, pp. 645–652. DOI: 10.1115/OMAE2008-57349
- Pollock, N., Williams, R. “The business of expectations: How promissory organizations shape technology and innovation”, Social Studies of Science, 2010, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 525–548.
- “Marine renewable: current status and implications for R&D funding and the Marine Renewable Deployment Fund”, Renewables Advisory Board, 2008. Available at: http://18.104.22.168/CB/england/papers/pdfs/2008/RAB-2007–0182-FinalVersion.pdf (accessed on January 13, 2017).
- Schmid, S. Envisioning a Technological State: Reactor Design Choices and Political Legitimacy in the Soviet Union and Russia. PhD thesis. Cornell University, 2005.
- Schmid, S. “Nuclear Renaissance in the Age of Global Warming”, Bridges, December 12, 2006. Available at: http://cisac.fsi.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/Nuclear_Renaissance_in_the_Age_of_Global_Warming.pdf (accessed on January 13, 2017).
- Shapin, S. “Cordelia’s love: credibility and the social studies of science,” Perspectives on Science, 1995, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 255–275.
- Shore, C. “Espionage, policy and the art of government: the British Secret Services and the war on Iraq,” in: Ch. Shore et al. (eds.), Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power. New York: Berghahn Books, 2011, pp. 169–186.
- Selin, C. “Negotiating plausibility: intervening in the future of nanotechnology,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 2011, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 723–37.
- Sims, B., Henke, Ch. “Repairing credibility: repositioning nuclear weapons knowledge after the Cold War,” Social Studies of Science, 2012, vol. 42, pp. 324–347.
- Smith, H. “An Operational Wave Model for the South West Approaches,” PRIMaRE Research Conference, 2010. (Unpublished).
- Smith, H.C.M., Charles, P., Millar, D. “Further analysis of change in nearshore wave climate due to an offshore wave farm: An enhanced case study for the Wave Hub site,” Renewable Energy, 2012, vol. 40, pp. 51–64.
- Smith, H.C.M., Haverson, D., Smith, G.H. “A wave energy resource assessment case study: review, analysis and lessons learned,” Renewable Energy, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 510–521.
- “UK Wave and Tidal Key Resource Areas Project. Summary Report”, The Crown Estate, 2012. Available at: http://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/media/5476/uk-wave-and-tidal-key-resource-areas-project.pdf (accessed on January 13, 2017).
- “The Offshore Valuation: A valuation of the UK’s offshore renewable energy resource,” The Offshore Valuation Group, 2010. Available at: http://publicinterest.org.uk/offshore/downloads/offshore_valuation_exec.pdf (accessed on January 13, 2017).
- Thomas, G. “The Theory behind the Conversion of Ocean Wave Energy: a Review,” in: J. Cruz (ed.), Ocean wave energy: current status and future perspectives. Green Energy and Technology. Berlin: Springer, 2008, pp. 41–91.
- Van Nieuwkoop, J., Smith, H.C.M., Smith, G.H., Johanning, L. “Wave resource assessment along the Cornish coast (UK) from a 23-year hindcast dataset validated against buoy measurements,” Renewable Energy, 2013, vol. 58, pp. 1–14.
- Vantoch-Wood, A. Quantifying Methods for an Innovation Systems Analysis of the UK Wave Energy Sector. PhD thesis. University of Exeter, 2012.
- Vaughan, D. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.
- Webster, A. “Crossing boundaries social science in the policy room,” Science Technology & Human Values, 2007, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 458–478.
- Xie, J., Zuo, L. “Dynamics and control of ocean wave energy converters,” International Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2013, vol. 1, pp. 162–276.
- Zinn, D.L. “The Case of Scanzano: Raison d’État and the Reasons for Rebellion,” in: Ch. Shore et al. (ed.) Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2011, pp. 227–243.